Journey Kits v. Destination Kits

Every few days, someone will post a question over on the FSM forums. Which P-51 kit is the best? What’s the best kit for someone getting back into the hobby after twenty years away? That sort of thing.

Within ten posts, these threads usually devolve into Revell/Monogram versus “those expensive Japanese brands”.

It’s tiresome. There are merits to both sides. And besides, “best” is a highly subjective term. One person’s “best” may not necessarily be another’s. There are too many factors at work. Building preferences, cost, proclivity or even ability to scratchbuild. And so on.

I’d like to offer a new way of describing kits. Not as good or bad or expensive or cheap. Not as the “best”.

Rather, as “journey” kits and “destination” kits.

Think of it like travel. Rome is an awesome destination, but getting there from Texas is a suckfest. Meanwhile, Washington, D.C. is an okay destination, but the roadtrip is an absolute blast. So in that case, it’s as much about the journey as the final destination.

Destination kits are kits you build for the subject, and if the kit were somehow, magically, of a different plane (or tank or whatever), you’d probably think twice. Maybe because there’d be a better option, or a cheaper option, or a Revellogram option, or whatever blows your skirt up.

I’d call Academy’s P-38F Lightning a destination kit. It’s one of the few games in town if you want to build a Lightning, and one of the only early Lightnings currently on the market. So you’re kind of stuck with it. I’d say the same of Eduard’s Yak-3. It’s a decent enough kit, but if it wasn’t the only Yak-3 in 1/48 scale, I’d look elsewhere.

Journey kits are kits you build for the kit rather than the subject. Because it’s a great kit. Because it’s gotten fantastic reviews or maybe just because you have fun building it.

Zvezda’s La-5 falls into this category for me. My interest in the kit was at least as strong as the subject going in. The same is true of their new Bf-109F-2. There are other F-2s, but Zvezda is doing interesting thing with how they engineer their kits, and I tend to place a premium on inventive engineering.

Other kits I’d consider journey kits include:

Wing-Scale’s 1/32 B-25 Mitchell family – These debut kits from the new manufacturer just look like a blast. Thoughtful engineering, obvious passion behind the project, and just the audacity of boxing a large-scale B-25.

Tamiya’s 1/32 Spitfire family – While I like the Spitfire, there are plenty of fighters I’d put ahead of it. But Tamiya’s Spits show so much imagination and innovation that I’m eager to build one just for the experience alone. The detail, the fit, using magnets to locate removable cowl pieces, metal-reinforced landing gear…WANT!

Tamiya’s 1/48 Fieseler Fi 156C Storch – Another subject that I’m kind of meh about – I mean – a German observation plane! The excitement! But Tamiya’s gone crazy with this one. Clear parts molded directly onto solid parts in the manufacturing process. A photo-etch metal wing spar to overcome the crazy greenhouse/wing design. Fully detailed engine. Like Tamiya’s Spits, the Storch just seems like one hell of a build experience, one I’d buy for the kit alone.

Of course, kits can fall somewhere in between. Tamiya’s P-47 kits are right in that sweet spot for me. The Jug is my favorite plane, but Tamiya’s kit is a joy to work with, too.

What about you? What would you consider a destination kit? A journey kit?

3 Comments Add yours

  1. Dave says:

    That’s a great way to put it. I’m working on a Revell Harrier right now. It is definitely a “destination kit” and the journey has been a bit like getting to Rome from Texas. I keep thinking “are we there yet?”

  2. pepper kay says:

    Hi Doogs:

    Have to agree with your definitions …

    The Sea Fury I built for the Korean War GB was just such … a destination kit …

    So far, I’ve yet to purchase a journey kit, but have my eyes on several I’ve been reading about (primarily in SAMI) and one of these days soonest, will buy and build …

    Thanks for your great build work and herculean effort on this site …


  3. Ian Orford says:

    Great definition, we can also call ‘destination kits’ ‘struggle’ kits or ‘why the %$£” did I start this’ kits and we’ve all had those over the years.

    Having just come back to the hobby, and having had a couple of false starts and ‘destination’ kits under my belt, I am determined to build only journey kits from here on in! I am waiting for my new Cyber Hobby Messerschmitt Bf109E-4 to arrive from Sprue Brothers, the Tamiya 1/32 scale spits are definitely on the list, plus a couple of others I have identified as ‘journey’ kits.

    But wait, looking at my build list which includes a HELLER NORD 2501 NORATLAS TRANSPORT in 1/72 SCALE (For my broad brush Luftwaffe collection WW11 to present), it already looks like I have a ‘destination’ kit in there already!

    How did that happen?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.