1/32 Fly Hurricane – Thoughts at the Midway Point

At what point does “it’s a limited run kit” stop being an explanation, and become an excuse?

As I reach the halfway point of my Fly Hurricane review build, that’s the question that keeps rising to the surface.

What do I mean by explanation and excuse?

Simple. By their very nature, limited run kits have certain…quirks…that just have to be lived with. A lack of locator pins. Soft detail on smaller parts. Unusually thick plastic on the larger fuselage and wing pieces. The vagaries of dealing with resin. One can bitch about these, but they generally have to be accepted going in – just the nature of the beast.

Thus, “it’s a limited run kit” as explanation.

BUT. There are also choices that have to be made that exist independent of a limited run kit’s quirky limitations. The way the parts break down, the way the instructions lay out, the decision as to which parts are given the resin treatment, and which are not.

When these choices are hand-waved away with “it’s a limited run kit”, that, to me, becomes an excuse.

Fly’s Hurricane contains a mix of both.

Since this build is being extensively documented via video, there’s quite a bit of work left to do before I can readily share the full build experience.


However, as sort of a holding action, I wanted to share my impressions up to this midway-ish point.

The surface detail is quite good

The Fly Hurricane has probably the best surface detail I’ve ever seen on a limited run kit. The fuselage has a lovely stressed fabric effect going on aft of the cockpit, and up front, the fastener detail is better than what’s seen on many more traditional injection molded kits. But the wings are the stars here, with a mix of glorious fastener detail, recessed and raised rivets, and well-done control surfaces.

The instructions are horseshit

While Fly’s instructions look nice enough on a brief flip-through, once you start using them to actually build the kit, it’s like wading into a parfait of fail. 


The Parts Legend. The Hurricane’s sprues lack any kind of lettering or numbering. To compensate, Fly provides a parts legend…and sticks it in the front of the instructions. Which means you’re constantly having to flip back to refer to it. It’s a minor annoyance, but when they provide separate sheets for schemes and for stencil placement, would it have killed them to throw in a separate legend?

Overselling Detail. Several parts – the control yoke for example – are rendered in loving detail in the instructions, only to be revealed as detailless sticks and blobs on the sprues. Why the fuck would they do this? To me, it’s a game of expectations that they’re just setting themselves up to lose with the disappointing reality of the parts.

Detail Inaccuracy. Many of the parts and assemblies in the instructions are just rendered flat-out incorrectly. Parts are a completely different shape than represented, impacting placement. 


The “Travesty of C19” is actually just a minor example. The instrument panel rendering is missing fucking gauges – and would have you add photo etch to places where gauges exist on the actual parts.

Vague Placement Guidance. On a kit with no location pins and very little in the way of positive fit and alignment, placement is key. Install the control yoke too far forward, and it’s going to interfere with the instrument panel. And so on. But placement aids in the instructions come only in the form of vague red arrows, and following them blindly can and will get you into trouble.

Poor Build Order. As with placement guidance, if you follow the build order of the instructions, you will find yourself in trouble. For instance, in Step 2 you get to install some control linkages to the control yoke. On the next page, with Step 5 or 6, you have to add a triangular piece of tubework under the control linkages that Step 2 tells you to glue down. Uh…

The cockpit builds…competently

While positive fit isn’t really a thing with the Hurricane, and the instructions don’t exactly do any favors, the cockpit does build up competently. I don’t like how it traps you into committing to cement before you can test-fit a few steps ahead, and the installation into the fuselage is a bit perilous (I would have added some “undershelf” elements to the tube framing to ensure a more solid fit in the fuselage), but the parts do come together to form a recognizable cockpit that does – with a bit of shaving of those shelf bits – fit into the fuselage without too much drama.


The control yoke should have been done in resin

Think about the cockpits of most World War II fighters. What draws the eye? The seat, the instrument panel, and the control stick. The latter is even more prominent in aircraft like the Hurricane and Spitfire, with their distinctive spade grips. Given that many other elements are molded in resin, it baffles that such a prominent detail piece would be left to soft, injection plastic.

The resin gear bay isn’t such a big deal

Resin gear bays are notorious for causing fit headaches, but after the annoying work of removing this one’s pour stub, things actually…fit!


The fuselage fits together nicely

Despite a frustrating quality of the plastic that makes it slow to cure under the influence of Tamiya Extra Thin or MEK, the fuselage does fit together quite well, with no significant steps or panel line misalignment to speak of.


So. The build continues. As of now it definitely seems to be a mixed bag. Some good, some not so good. Some “it’s a limited run kit” as a perfectly acceptable explanation, some “it’s a limited run kit” acting as an excuse for some silly decisions and execution.

How will it all shake out? I assume that will have a lot to do with how the wings go…

Note: I realize that, technically, the Fly Hurricane is not a “limited run” kit. But, like Special Hobby, Fly’s kits possess characteristics that the modelling world generally associates with “limited run”. Low-pressure injection molding, the use of mixed media to cover off on detail elements, and so on. So, for ease of communication, I’m going to just keep referring to it as “limited run”.

7 Comments Add yours

  1. jonsteed47 says:

    you should know better because if you a well plan out instruction sheets you can not have a well detail plane or tank something is always wrong either way and yet if does happen then for either plane or tank the price is too high -150 to 250 dollars for a 1/.32 scale plane .

    1. Doogs says:

      I don’t think it’s too much to ask for the instructions to 1) reflect the reality of the kit and 2) use a build order that won’t leave you fucked. I mean, now that I’ve built the cockpit up, if I were doing it over, I’d go about it in a completely different way.

  2. Crawford Wilson says:

    I really like the way you break it all down. I am not a first time model builder, and I have a few years of previous experience, but I am not where near your “level” as a modeler. To read your breakdown, and then reflect on the “reviews” online, and in some model magazines, I can definitely say I can use this sort of review much better than I cam most of the online reviews I have seen. Additionally, if i were a first time modeler, or an “inexperienced” modeler, I would definitely be able to use this sort of a review.

    Thank you! Crawford Wilson

    1. Doogs says:

      Glad you’re finding some usefulness!

      1. Crawford Wilson says:

        Finding some usefulness?!? … No, really, I teach AFJROTC. I started a model club, and I show your stuff as a way to help the cadets to see what they CAN do as a modeler. it is VERY useful! The last thing I want them to think after seeing what YOU can do is to say, “that’s too much” or “I will never be that good”. I am not as good as you, but I show them what you can do, and show then what I am doing and say you can also be THIS good if you continue to apply yourself and what you are doing ‘wrong’ and make necessary corrections. I make all of my tools available to those who do not have their own tools. That way, they have no excuse to say “I cant” and the lack of resources is not a show stopper. The reviews/builds page is a great way to show what a modeler will face when trying to make a great model.


  3. shipmodeler says:

    This is pretty much of the type review I had hoped for with only one criticism. Is the fowl language necessary? For review purposes, I think I can easily say no, only because you must purposely go to the trouble to type f**k when another perfectly appropriate adjective would suffice. Writing on the Internet is no different than speaking in public. I.e. youngsters and people with different taste in language read it. I’m no prude and I have used my share of foul words, but I try to always be considerate of the people around me. Yeah, I know it’s your blog and your review (except some folks helped pay for the model), and if I don’t like it I can go elsewhere. Plus the fact that I didn’t help pay for the review, so take all that as you will. I only say the review would be just the same with appropriate language. FWIW


  4. Libor says:

    Reviewed as a fit-test build on IPMS NYMBURK forum. Notice unfortunately in Czech language only http://www.ipmsnymburk.com/forum/viewtema.php?ID_tema=39274

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.